Teen Fatalities Could Increase 10 Percent

Should the United States lower the legal drinking age to 18 years old? Is it fair that the men and women, under the age of 21, in the military can make life and death decisions, but cannot drink alcohol? Will this improve binge drinking on college campuses? Will this increase the number of alcohol influenced drivers on the road? Is there a real problem with keeping the legal drinking age at 21 years old? These are all extremely relevant questions that we should all be asking ourselves when forming an opinion on this topic.

Presidential elections are a time for change and growth. During several debates and interviews candidates have been asked whether they support the lowering of the legal drinking age to 18 years old. Some candidates have said yes and some have said no. As to all issues there are many sides and opinions.

I do NOT agree with lowering the legal drinking age.

I respect and appreciate the men and women in the military who fight for our rights and freedoms everyday. However, joining the military is a choice. Furthermore, it is a job that these men and women are receiving a fair compensation, medical and retirement benefits, a free education, and self gratification. Yes, Americans depend on these individuals to protect our country but only after intense training and still under supervision. Our troops do not go out to fight alone.

Binge drinking will never stop on college campuses. <http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3708133> The safety coalition agrees that binge drinking and underage drinking continue to be a problem, but lowering the drinking age will only make problems worse. To some students college is a time to learn and grow. To other students college is a place to party, experiment, and rebel.

Lowering the drinking age will increase the number of drunken drivers on the road. Persons under the age of 21 have to drink in private places right now. If we lift this restriction and allow them to drink in public places they too will have to get home somehow. I do not care how responsible a person thinks he or she is, making decisions under the influence of alcohol is difficult. <http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=3708133> The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted nearly 50 peer-reviewed studies of countries that had changed their drinking age and found that lowering the age increased fatalities by 10 percent.

Is lowering the legal drinking age from 21 to 18 years old truly necessary for factual purposes or is it just conveinance driven? I have not found strong factual evidence that lowering the drinking age will have any significant difference in college campus binge drinking and underage drinking. As stated earlier, some students attend college for the sole purpose of drinking and having fun. Moreover, there will always be underage drinking. In most cases underage drinking is a result of curiosity, a means to fit in with an older crowd, the thrill of breaking the law and some just like the taste. Amanda Lee, a high school biology teacher, said "The human brain does not stop developing until we reach our early to mid 20s, an undeveloped and alcohol influenced brain is not a good combination for decision making." If we chose to publicly serve and sell alcohol to 18 year olds we are opening up an entirely new can of worms. Our focus will no longer be 18 year olds drinking alcohol, it will be 14 - 17 year olds. Most 18 year olds are still in high school and could distribute alcohol to the younger students in that school. Jessica Whitley, a high school guidance counselor, said "There are already addiction problems occuring in high school, why would anyone be so stupid to make alcohol more accessible to kids." Currently, a high school student would have to know an older person outside of school who would be willing to supply alcohol for high school students.